Whilst agreeing with many of the comments, I see this schematic as an outline of the “MF Controlled Ecosystem” which is then, beyond this, subject to the impacts, and links into, the wider external Ecosystem of the market environment, partnerships, joint ventures, agreements, acquisitions, competitive influences, Mexican Family Office etc etc.
I prefer however that this schematic goes slightly deeper. The MF Portfolio Performances are driven by the scientific engine that feeds the Ecosystem. I see this as the beating-heart or brain of this Ecosystem. I also see the continuous development and fine-tuning of this engine as coming in a linked stream from the R & D Lab function.
I also think that “Accessibility” is only half the story in terms of the Ecosystem. What of the Institutional offering, which is quite different?
Also if this is seen as the UK Ecosystem - is it identical for Boston, USA. Which parts of the Ecosystem can simply be replicated for the States? What about the Dubai, Emirates Ecosystem? Will MF offices outside the UK be controlled centrally, with an imposed Ecosystem, or will there be a federated model applied, as with say INEOS?